Jan 27, 2026

In industrial fluid systems, media is rarely ideal. Steam pipelines, gas–liquid mixtures, and solid–liquid suspensions all represent typical two-phase flow conditions. These environments place significantly higher demands on a flow control valve than single-phase applications.
As two-phase fluid passes through a valve, rapid changes in density and velocity often create local low-pressure zones. When pressure drops below the vapor pressure, flashing and cavitation occur. Over time, these phenomena compromise flow stability and cause severe erosion to valve internals.

Many valve failures originate not from incorrect sizing, but from underestimated two-phase effects. Bubble collapse near valve surfaces produces high-energy micro-jets that repeatedly strike metal components. This leads to pitting, leakage, and early failure.
For a flow control valve, resistance to erosion depends not only on material selection, but also on internal flow geometry. Sharp turns, sudden restrictions, and multiple throttling points significantly increase cavitation intensity.
For gas–liquid mixtures and mild solid content, angle seat valves are often a practical solution. Their near-linear flow path minimizes abrupt directional changes, resulting in lower velocity loss and smoother pressure distribution.
This structural advantage reduces the likelihood of vapor bubble formation near the valve seat. In steam systems and thermal circuits, angle seat valves demonstrate stable performance where conventional designs struggle.
In low-pressure systems requiring precise regulation, the globe valve remains a reliable option. Its defined throttling geometry allows predictable flow adjustment, making it suitable for controlled two-phase applications such as heat exchangers.
Lower flow velocity inside the valve reduces erosion risk, while adjustable stroke length enables accurate flow modulation—an important advantage for process control engineers.
At higher pressures, throttling-focused valves often become erosion hotspots. Full bore ball valves address this issue through a nearly straight-through flow channel.
With minimal pressure drop and no internal restrictions, these valves reduce cavitation risk and prevent particle accumulation. For high-pressure two-phase systems, this design enhances durability and operational safety.

Selecting a flow control valve for two-phase flow requires more than pressure and size calculations. Engineers should evaluate flow path geometry, throttling behavior, and fluid phase transitions.
For distributors and system designers, understanding how valve structure interacts with two-phase dynamics helps reduce downtime, maintenance costs, and unexpected failures—delivering long-term reliability in demanding applications.
(FK9025)
PP Polypropylene Tube vs PVC Tubing: When Engineers Should Choose Polyolefin Solutions
Flow Control Valve Selection for Two-Phase Fluid Applications
Rotary Clamping Cylinder Troubleshooting: Ensuring Consistent Performance
Two-Piece vs Three-Piece Ball Valves: Why Maintenance Defines the Difference
Can SMC One Touch Fittings Be Used with Both Nylon Tubing and PU Tubing
You May Interest In
Jul 01, 2025 Blog
The Ultimate Guide to Pneumatic Control Valves
Mar 10, 2025 Blog
Customized Combination Manifold Valves
Dec 05, 2024 Case Studies
Customized Combination Manifold Valves
Dec 02, 2024 Case Studies
Custom Valve Manifolds design
Feb 09, 2018 Blog
How much you know about globe valve?
Apr 17, 2018 Blog
Attention to the installation of solenoid valve
Dec 20, 2017 Blog
The Characteristics of Angle Seat Valve
FOKCA ©1998-2025 Fescolo Pneumatic All Rights Reserved Sitemap